THE ARGUMENT /RESEARCH EVALUATION ESSAY FOR E2:
Evaluating a Social/Cultural Idea
or Event (by supporting a claim that reflects one view)
Notes for E2 [ADDITIONAL NOTES:] In evaluating social or
cultural ideas some of the most provocative questions and arguments occur
around theories to explain various "mysteries" or
challenging-to-understand issues or events. As a class project that gives
us a chance to look more deeply into an event or ongoing issue recent enough to
provide a wide array of opinions, research and living witnesses, we will review
and evaluate the material surrounding one of the following
social/cultural issues and any implications for our world. Using
"story," "analogy" or other rhetorical elements we have covered
will be strong parts of the final version--even epigraphs [a quotation
notesanalogy-oped.htm at the beginning of a book, chapter, etc, suggesting its theme] are encouraged.
As you investigate topics, choose one to focus on, and begin exploring more information, be sure to
let the verifiable evidence lead your thinking, rather than just use
"cherry-picked" supports to prop up your early personal leanings. As long as there is good evidence to support the thesis,
virtually any position on your topic is possible, but any topic must be
approved by the instructor. The topic you choose will conform to the
documentation style of the field of study which characterizes that topic: Fields of Study list | Fields
and Styles.
Possible topics to explore for E2 : Others may be considered,
but, again, please confer with me about them. No Pro-Con
or simple review of material fits this project. The links given below are for general information:
Project Details and Stages Overview:
Please choose one of the social/cultural topics above or--with instructor
approval--a "mystery," conspiracy theory or controversy that
intrigues you:
Scope of E2 Paper:
1. c.2000-2500 wds. - 8-10 pages (c.250wds/page--References,
Works Cited, etc. not included in word count ANNOTATED BIBILIOGRAPHGY IS A
SEPARATE LIST FROM THE LIST OF SOURCES USED IN THE PAPER. ) |
2.
with at least 5-8 sources cited from at least 8-10 in an annotated
bibliography |
3.
at least 2 cited sources must be from scholarly peer reviewed journals/databases
|
4. an
evaluation
/critique) of credibility
of one possible source [please include print out of first 1-2 pages and last 1-2
pages] of authoritative evidence |
5. a semi-formal research
proposal-(template includes annotated bibliography) |
6.
annotated bibliography explanation (at least 8-10 listings in template
above) |
7. conforms to appropriate format and
style for documented, argument writing in your topic's field. |
Here is
a
suggested staged progress for develpoing this paper. We
will have 4 weeks to complete the following material. These
four stages are divided by green, brown and purple lettering. These
stages and their assigned parts should can be turned in via Canvas each week
Wednesday midnight or can be accelerated as suits each student's pace, but the progress
journals and their parts will need to be turned in, in sequence.
·
Every week , even if a journal stage is not due, I will need a short email update on your progress
and any questions/problems you may have.
Stage one: A6 = journal to
Find the Focus-- As part of the
Topic Exp
document, add the other points (numbered) for this A6 journal. If some of these points seem repetitious, that's
a good thing. It shows you are focused.
2.
Make a list of some
search terms that produce useful information and make notes about what each offers.
3.
Explore internet
resources including COCC data bases, etc. that can show many facets of the
topic. Then copy/paste possible urls/citations and notes about
them for later.
4. Write a first version of a
thesis/claim sentence
(AI thesis
maker ;-)️) that includes
a reference (can use "although") to the main opposite or
counter-argument side. Include at least two reasons that reflect your
understanding of the topic at this point.
6. Add a few sentences about your
progress, and any questions, to this point.
Stage Two = Making a Research Proposal:
Find What Field of Study and Documentation Style Applies to Your
Topic, Finding/Evaluating Sources and Creating an Annotated Bibliography.
2.
Keep
an annotated list of urls and other resources
such as print periodicals, books, etc. (including the publishing information) --
the base of an A8
Annotated
Bibliography | UNC on
Annotated Bib. (part of the proposal
so no duplication is needed)
which for this
project must have at least 8-10 entries, from which will come the paper's list
of sources/bibliography.
3. Formulate a more solid thesis/claim sentence | Notes on Thesis (include counter-argument) and three main points/reasons (=an argument) for which you have and can present good evidence.
4.
Use
OWL Guide to Evaluate sources | Evaluate one possible source fully (all
considerations). Include the url of the article
if it is from the open internet or if it is from a data base, copy/paste the
first 2-3 pages and the list of sources from the end.
5.
Write out in paragraph form a statement of your current progress--problems,
etc.
Stage Three : A9 Building and
Shaping the
Draft (story/analogy) for peer edit (and if needed MS APA template)
Stage four-- Final Journal A10 is the PROCESS WRITING for E2 (and for the last one, an overview of what was valuable in the course) which is part of the packet including journals A6-A9 (scored or not--printed out) and any other progress journals. Continue completing the stages and finishing the parts of the final packet of material.Paper packet turn-in
Presto--E2 pretty much done....
Jane Thielsen © 2023 ♦ COCC ♦ all rights
reserved